The results of the research project are now available in one volume reference work which brings together all four individual studies. The publication provides answers to the hitherto unanswered question of how the Chancellery navigated the tensions between democracy and the Nazi past. The studies confirm that overcoming authoritarian structures of governance, administration and public communication, as well as finding personnel in the central German governing authority not tainted by attachment to National Socialism was a decades-long process and by no means linear. Judging by the claim that the Federal Republic strived to be a Western democracy, the Federal Chancellery and the Federal Press Office were as much part of the problem as they were part of the solution. Especially during the era of Konrad Adenauer and Hans Globke, the Chancellery was characterized by resistance to change, reform and openness. In light of these conditions, this raises the urgent question as to how a stable, democratic order which has lasted for 75 years was able to emerge a spart of Germany’s second attempt at democracy. On the one hand, the Nazi past and the ambivalent way the Chancellery addressed that past undoubtedly made the new start more difficult. On the other hand, it is still possible that ideas of democracy which are questionable from today’s perspective, communication of those ideas by people with significant Nazi pasts, Adenauer’s authoritarian leadership style, and his virulent anti-communism were precisely the reasons that a population shaped by dictatorship and war embraced Germany’s second democracy.